Special Meeting – January 11, 2019 at 3:00 pm
200 N. Washington Square, 3rd Floor
Lansing, MI
Agenda: The Commission will hold a special meeting, the primary purpose of which will be to consider moving into a closed session pursuant to §8 of the Open Meetings Act (MCL 15.268).
Contact: Deborah Mitchell, dmitchell@michiganidc.gov, 517-657-3060
At the Michigan Indigent Defense Commission meeting on August 21, 2018, the Commission approved for publication the MIDC Guide for Reporting and Distribution of Grant Funds (revised December, 2018) to assist systems with implementation of approved compliance plans. Based on feedback, the compliance reporting information at the end of the Guide has been revised.
Read the Guide for Reporting here.
Stay up to date with information on our Grants page.
The Michigan Indigent Defense Commission will hold a regularly scheduled meeting on Tuesday December 18, 2018 beginning at 1 p.m. at the Lansing office:
200 N. Washington Square, Lower Level
Lansing, MI 48913
Read the agenda here.
Minutes from past meetings can be found on our website.
For more information, please contact the MIDC office, 517-388-6702.
Read the MIDC’s proposed standard for indigent defense workloads here.
MIDC RAND Time Study Quick Start Guide
MIDC RAND Time Study Users Guide
The Michigan Indigent Defense Commission (MIDC), with the assistance of the RAND Corporation, will be developing maximum caseload standards for the delivery of indigent defense services in Michigan in 2018. These standards will apply to the adult indigent criminal defense caseloads of all attorneys in the state, whether such appointments arise from a contract counsel program, an assigned counsel program, a public defender office, or some combination thereof. The MIDC has been charged by the Legislature with ensuring that the workload assigned to indigent defense counsel does not reach the point where effective representation is jeopardized:
The MIDC shall implement minimum standards, rules, and procedures to guarantee the right of indigent defendants to the assistance of counsel as provided under amendment VI of the Constitution of the United States and section 20 of article I of the state constitution of 1963. In establishing minimum standards, rules, and procedures, the MIDC shall adhere to the following principles: … (b) Defense counsel’s workload is controlled to permit effective representation. Economic disincentives or incentives that impair defense counsel’s ability to provide effective representation shall be avoided. The MIDC may develop workload controls to enhance defense counsel’s ability to provide effective representation.
Mich. Comp. Laws § 780.991
Maximum caseload standards are simply tools to help identify when the number and mix of criminal defense cases assigned an attorney are likely to have resulted in workload demands that may adversely impact the attorney’s ability to adequately discharge his or her ethical obligations to clients. Previously recognized maximum recommended caseload standards were developed in 1972 by the National Advisory Counsel (NAC) of the U.S. Department of Justice Task Force on the Courts, and recommended, for example, that indigent defenders take on no more than 150 new felonies or 400 new misdemeanors per year. Such standards are now almost a half century old, do not distinguish case types beyond a few simplistic categories, and, most importantly, do not reflect the particular challenges facing Michigan counsel who represent Michigan defendants in Michigan courtrooms for alleged violations of Michigan law. It is for this reason that the MIDC believes contemporary standards accurately reflecting the Michigan experience are needed to help avoid excessive caseloads that violate the Sixth Amendment.
The project involves three major data collections that will take place sequentially over the next few months. While additional information will be provided to the bar and local indigent defense systems as the launch date for each data collection approaches, the following is a general overview of these steps towards standards development:
First, RAND will conduct a time study of indigent defense attorneys across the state of Michigan. What this means is that for approximately eight weeks, RAND will be asking attorneys who are appointed to criminal cases on Michigan trial courts to track the time they spend on all appointed cases on behalf of adult indigent defendants. By doing that, we can know how much time, on average, attorneys now spend on various client matters as well as the time expended on certain tasks commonly performed in those cases. Essentially every indigent defense attorney in the state will be invited to take part in the time study. Participation will, of course, be voluntary, but we hope that the critical importance of the caseload standard development work in assuring adequate resources for the future will provide ample incentives for attorneys to assist in this effort.
We will be using an online timekeeping application for the study which attorneys will be able to access from just about any internet-connected device, including desktop computers and smartphones. The application has been designed by JusticeWorks, a developer of case management systems and timekeeping software for indigent defense programs across the country. The application has been tailored to the needs of this project by RAND and the MIDC. Note that only time directly spent on indigent defense cases will be tracked; time spent on other matters (such as privately retained cases, civil court matters, or non-case specific activities) will not be recorded.
As a result of the submission of compliance plans by local indigent defense systems last November, the MIDC has assembled a master list of Michigan indigent defense attorneys and their email addresses. Invitations to participate in the Indigent Defense Time Study and instructions on how to submit time information will be sent to those attorneys by email.
It is vitally important that indigent defense attorneys participate in this time study. While the burden of tracking case-related time for appointed clients over the eight week period is admittedly not trivial, the information gathered will help inform the caseload standards setting process and will make sure that the final results are grounded in reality rather than mere conjecture.
While extremely important, the time study will only describe the current reality in Michigan indigent defense, which may not reflect optimal caseload levels. In that light, the second data collection will seek to learn whether the bar believes that these average time expenditures are sufficient for effective and ethical representations. After the time study is complete, we will conduct a brief web-based survey to find out what attorneys think is the minimum amount of time that should be devoted, on average, to criminal defense cases in order to provide adequate legal representation. The survey will present results from the time study and will ask whether or not those averages are reasonable. Essentially every indigent defense attorney in the state will be invited by email to take part in the survey, even if he or she did not participate in the time study.
As was true with the time study, attorney participation in the time sufficiency survey is extremely important. This survey provides an explicit means for the indigent defense bar to voice their opinions as to whether they consistently have enough time available to defend all of their clients in a Constitutionally and professionally responsible manner.
The final data collection activity will involve a session designed to synthesize the opinions of a panel of select attorneys with extensive experience in the delivery of criminal defense in Michigan. After sharing the results of the time study and time sufficiency survey with the panel members, the session will employ the RAND-developed Delphi methodology to build consensus among these attorney experts as to the minimum amount of time that, on average, would be required to provide criminal defendants with adequate legal services in various types of cases.
The output of the Delphi session will be evaluated, and the results used as the basis for the MIDC’s recommended maximum caseload standards. The standards will describe the maximum number of cases of any particular type that can be effectively represented by a full time attorney over one year.
One important area that should be noted are the confidentiality procedures that RAND will follow. None of the results of this work will be published or circulated in a form in which individual attorneys or their clients can be identified. Neither the MIDC, Michigan courts, indigent defense administrators and organizations, nor the defense providers themselves will receive data from the time study or the sufficiency survey that will allow time expenditures or activity information to be linked with individual attorneys or individual cases. Attorneys participating in the time study or the sufficiency survey will be given unique usernames and passwords to log onto the data collection websites, and the crosswalk between those IDs and the attorneys’ names will be destroyed after the project is complete. RAND takes the protection of sensitive information extremely seriously, and complies with stringent federal standards in this area.
At the present time, we anticipate that key project events will take place as follows. The timeline is subject to revision by the MIDC and the RAND researchers.
Week of June 4
Week of June 11
Week of June 18
Week of June 25
Weeks of July 2 through August 6
Week of August 13
Week of August 20
Week of August 27
Week of September 3
Week of September 10
Week of September 17
We plan to periodically this MIDC project webpage with more detailed project timelines, instructions for participating in the indigent defense time study and attorney time sufficiency survey, and notices of upcoming events.
Finally, we reiterate our hope that the indigent defense bar will understand that participation in the data collection efforts described above will have lasting and profound consequences for their profession and for their clients in the years to come.
If you have any questions, please contact Dr. Jonah Siegel, Research Director at the Michigan Indigent Defense Commission by phone (1-517-657-3062) or email (jsiegel@michiganidc.gov). Nicholas M. Pace, project lead at the RAND Corporation, can be reached at nickpace@rand.org or 1-310-393-0411 ext. 6176.
A new report released by the Michigan Indigent Defense Commission examines the financial incentives and disincentives inherent to the compensation structures utilized in many local indigent defense systems throughout Michigan, making a case for critical reform tied to proposed Standard 8, Economic Incentives and Disincentives.
From our agency’s inception, it has been clear that addressing the issue of economic incentives and disincentives would be one of the Michigan Indigent Defense Commission’s (MIDC) most formidable and complicated challenges. Disincentives to providing quality representation are endemic to many indigent defense systems, both throughout Michigan and nationally. Without reform, such disincentives will continue to disservice attorneys, taxpayers, and indigent defense clients, whose liberty and well-being are at risk. –– MIDC Chair Michael Puerner
The report reviews the current incentive mechanisms utilized by systems across the state and discusses the strengths and weaknesses of each. It then offers a series of recommendations for local systems to implement compensation structures that directly encourage attorneys to provide effective representation. Please see the report here for both an executive summary and the full text.
The Michigan Indigent Defense Commission will hold a public hearing on proposed Standards 5, 6, 7, and 8 in Lansing, Michigan during the Commission meeting to be held on June 12, 2018.
The proposed standards address the need for independence from the judiciary, defender workload limitations, qualification and review of attorneys accepting assignments in adult criminal cases, and economic incentives and disincentives. Read the full text of the standards here.
Download the complete packet of standards here.
Comments on the proposed standards can be sent to the MIDC via email at comments@michiganidc.gov or mailed to the MIDC’s office at 200 N. Washington Square, 3rd Floor, Lansing, MI 48913.
Comments are due no later than June 12, 2018.
The MIDC is required to publish an annual report pursuant to M.C.L. §780.999. The 2017 Report Planning for Change by the Michigan Indigent Defense Commission covers all activities of the Commission and Staff, our budget and expenditures, and recommendations for legislative action pursuant to M.C.L. §780.989(h).
The complete packet of minimum standards for indigent defense delivery systems is available to download from the MIDC’s website here. Standards 1, 2, 3, and 4 have been approved by the Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs effective May 22, 2017. Information for funding units can be found on our website here including contact information for our Regional Managers working statewide.
Standards 5, 6, 7 and 8 have been proposed by the MIDC and a comment period is open until June12, 2018.
Read the complete packet of standards here.
Visit our standards page for more information.
The Michigan Indigent Defense Commission meets regularly in Lansing. Information about upcoming meetings and minutes from all meetings can be found on the MIDC’s website.
View our calendar.
Read about our Commissioners.
SUBMISSION DEADLINE: February 12, 2018 by 5:00 p.m.
Apply online by clicking here.
Regional Manager: South Central Michigan
Counties covered: Clinton, Eaton, Genesee, Gratiot, Hillsdale, Ingham, Jackson, Lenawee, Livingston, Monroe, Shiawassee, and Washtenaw.
Summary
The Michigan Indigent Defense Commission (MIDC) is seeking a Regional Manager to facilitate the creation of superior systems for representation of indigent clients charged with crimes. Regional Managers provide direction and guidance to indigent defense delivery systems around the state on compliance with MIDC-enacted standards. They serve as the liaisons between local systems and the MIDC.
This challenging and rewarding opportunity will require the skills of a diplomat and knowledge of indigent defense systems and models. Regional Managers must have a thorough working knowledge of the MIDC Act and a wide variety of models of indigent defense delivered locally in Michigan and nationwide. Successful candidates will work with criminal justice stakeholders to design the most appropriate plans for meeting minimum standards for indigent defense in a particular county or system.
Essential Duties and Responsibilities
Education and Experience
Preferred candidates will have a juris doctor degree and experience representing indigent clients. A minimum of five years of progressively more responsible work experience working in court, public, or business administration, or representing indigent clients is desired. A bachelor’s degree is required, and a master’s degree in public or business administration or a juris doctor from an accredited law school may be substituted for two years of experience.
Certificates, Licenses, Registrations
Due to significant travel within the region, an individual with a valid driver’s license and insured vehicle is required.
Work Location:
The ideal candidate should be based in a South Central Michigan county as indicated in the position description.
Periodic travel to the MIDC Office in Lansing, Michigan is expected.
—–
For applicants not currently residing or working in the South Central Michigan region: please describe in your cover letter your connection to the area or other reason for interest in the region.
SUBMISSION DEADLINE: February 12, 2018 by 5:00 p.m.
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER